Friday, August 2, 2013

Donkey View -- Good Fun -- And Good for You

Donkey View 
The new World Order
                                         . . . . And those in doubt

I noticed the keen commentary on the leftist Donkey's Blog.  Especially when he goes into the Donkey Mode.  A neat feature that really shows it's homogenous nature when he's locked into "Donkey View".

What is Donkey View you may ask?  It's real simple.

Donkey View is a slick way for those suffering from codependency to manifest self worth while mortaring together the building blocks of self esteem.  Simple to use, it's much easier than dropping letters addressed to yourself in the mailbox.

With Donkey View, you just post a comment on your own blog, then let your pentup frustrations of non-self importance cure themselves.  You engage in a conversation with yourself without having to wait for letters that you have mailed to yourself.  Nor, as statistics and the latest polls prove, quite simply, will you rarely argue with yourself. You may however, bestow upon yourself the monikers of brilliance you so richly deserve.

More slick benefits of healthful self stimulation without the manipulation of appendages.  Ever wanted others to know how smart you are.  Hell, it's easy.  Just tell them as you talk to yourself through the words in your own journal.  Pretty soon you'll be talking to yourself and glad handing all the premium acolytes your epitaph can endure. 

And in your mind -- you deserve it -- Don't you?

It's real time and, it's exciting.

Imagine talking to yourself, perhaps expounding all your single entendre' thoughts, and a few strokes later, you are actually answering your own questions, while simultaneously asserting your self worth and expounding old cliché's and euphemisms that bathes you in the warm glow that only a mother's compliment could manifest.

Donkey View does come with warnings though. It's highly addictive, and it has been reported to have tendencies where megalomaniacs have come dangerously close to high-jacking their own blog without their knowledge.  Scary stuff.

But watching someone use Donkey View leaves an audience breathless.

Good Fun,  Highly entertaining.
If you find yourself on the left.

Just know I'm right.

Here's lookin at you Buddy Boy

Friday, February 8, 2013

Some People are better than pigeons at Chess except for #3

                                                           Numbers don't lie unless you're a Jack Ass
                                                         Another Racist in the eyes of Non-Americans
Listen to stutterbug Obama, he will be the first to admit he wasn't good at math, here he speaks to sheep, and as always the cost to the American taxpayers is overlooked.  When America is in dire financial straights, he's focusing on breaking the bank with unsustainable entitlement programs for what, is it votes?  Because only a STOOL pigeon would believe there is enough birdseed to go around for all the peckerheads to eat . . . .  No guns, allow immigration, but no spending cuts. And no budget. All Obama, little style and no substance.  Below is a great example of what President Obama is unleashing on America.

Check out these friendly Illegals on the streets of America.  legalizing these thugs, our prisons can't take it, nor can our economy.  Let them vote, really?
Do Americans have any idea what's coming with amnesty, this goes on all over America, and now the government is empowering them.  The new voters.

Turn to our history books and point out to Obama why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.

They had waved goodbye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.

Their children came of age when World War II broke out. Many fought along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany, Italy, France and Japan. None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan. They were defending the United States of America as one people.

When we liberated France, no one in those villages were looking for the French-American or the German-American or the Irish-American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.

And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about.  They fly their flags over American soil, then thumb their noses at American laws.  They take jobs from Americans, their lack of ability to speak English is destroying the American schools because teachers are to busy trying to teach English and that time could be better spent teaching Americans math and science

I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life.

I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.

It's destroying this country's resources.  And they're unsustainable.

And there you have it.  Straight from the Horse's mouth.

And you pigeons playing chess, don't really have a clue what made America great, but you sure know how to call American's racist, it's just your style. 

Press 1 for English . . . always -- and forever buddy boy for the true potrait of pigeonesque mirrors the portrait of the Jack Ass.  Vaya Con Dias.

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Playing Chess with Pigeons.

Hi Mikey, Get Well Soon
Love Me I'm a Liberal
Haven't blogged alot lately, been enjoying life and good company.  But I ventured into Edith Ann's blog last week or should I say uninformed rant on gun control.  Calling clips magazines and so on and so forth.  Asked her why she is adamantly against large capacity magazines, as I showed videos of people loading them in one second flat into various firearms. I asked her if she knew the difference between large caliber bullets and small caliber bullets and tried to explain how large bullets are so much more deadly than small ones.

I listened to her state how deadly 100 round "Clips" are as opposed to 10 round clips or 20.
I nicely explained that very few 100 round magazines are even in circulation today, and the last instance of a high capacity magazine killing might have been used by Al Capone's henchmen in the 1920's. And most important, they don't work consistently, jam autoloaders, and are extremely bulky.
I asked her if it's ok to kill 10 people with a 10 round clip, and too reload and kill 10 more.  Obviously she's in favor of ten round clips, but the 20, 30, 50, and 100 round clips are the killers.

I nicely tried to explain her month long exploration of her Guns & Ammo foray into solving mass murders might not be her cup of tea.  But I wholeheartedly agree with her views of people with health problems or illnesses, should be deprived of their right to own firearms.

When these simple facts and videos were linked and explained to her, which in turn pretty much contradicted everything she said, with such little nuances, such as FACTS.  

Guess what, the Pigeons came home to roost.  Just as she lamented at the Advocate in the past how unsavory, and high-handed the delete Nazi's at the Advocate were.  (Many times.)  She saw the the unfortunate insertion of a few facts into her blog. You'll never guess what happened . . . .

So the Naziette, took a deep breath, blew a kiss to Schumer and, then she tore a page out of the Advocate's playbook and deleted every post in her blog I had written.  Facts are so cumbersome when they don't work for you.  I put opinions in there as well, but the facts, well they're correct.

So let's roll on a little about playing chess with pigeons, and remember no matter how good a chess player I am, the pigeons are gonna knock all the pieces to the floor, poop all over the board, then fly away to their nests and poop more.  Which suits me, because facts prove so cumbersome.

The same can be said of opinions, but as long as you state your opinions, and preface your statements knowlingly, it is your opinion, at least have the coutesy to write, type, or talk without calling a person . . . . Drum roll . . . . A RACIST.

Here's a well known that fact liberal pigeons have a fond and frequent propensity to call people (Racists) when:

1. Someone disagrees with them.
2. Someone asks them a question they know the answer to be opposite of what they just said or wrote.
3. Someone uses facts against them.
4. Someone has a different opinion that they do.
5. Someone's poll figures are different from theirs
6. Someone questions a word used by their favorite news, media, or polling outlet.
7. Someone asks if welfare theft exists, or if entitlement programs are used by people undeserving.
8. Someone ask to debate them, they say they don't debate, but you read their bio at the Advocate and they love a good debate.  Then again refer to numbers 2 and 3.
9. Someone uses statistics other than theirs or their approved agencies.

Where's David Letterman when you need him for number 10.   Drum roll.

10. As you're wiping all the poop off the chessboard they have no idea how it got there.  But golly, you're a RACIST.

So after that I put my Queen on her own color and then I went to visit local liberal # two.  I took a lot of Clorox and rags cause that man sure can poop up a storm, and gentleman, start your engines, Pigeon Mike. true to his form, tagged me for my racist statements in the first sentence and continued to do so right out of the starting blocks and through out his blog.

Have some fun here and notice how bird brain epitomizes the ten liberal jackwagon tell-tale signs of a liberal opining his lack of people skills with repetitive name calling.

A must read.  I'll be Perry Mason, in actuality my name is Todd Jett, the liberals prefer to remain anonymous and in the past they've taken great joy telling the world who I am.  Especially when they don't agree with me.

Thinks it hurts my feelings, in reality, it's like giving them the trophy of cowardice, which they well deserve for slinging mud behind IP addresses. 

Though I don't always agree with Big J.  At least he's not a coward, he speaks his mind and signs his name. And much can be said for that.  I recently reviewed his past posts at the Advocate, and he's no fan of amnesty.

In my humble opinion, here's probably the biggest coward I have ever blogged too.

Mike has with great joy, written my real name in his blog when he's upset with me for a differing opinion, though I know his real name, I've not done the same to him.  I've watched him write for years in the Advocate, and when the Advocate stated transperancy was necessary along with a Facebook account to remain blogging at the Advocate, his cowardice left him to his own blog for fear of you or I knowing who he really is. I assure you . . .  it's not National security related.

And anybody he suspected of blogging without permission, well -- he was the mover and shaker behind the scenes at the Advocate. 

Rat, Tattletail, Stooge, Stoolie, I'm not name calling.  Those are the facts.  Some people were banned for off the chart beliefs and serious mud-slinging.  I just had a big disagreement with the the Editor as to how a citizen was scalped in the paper.  Nothing more, nothing less.

When I called an Advocate reporter out for slanted articles Mike called me a racist.
When I was displeased with Obama I'm a racist.
When I disagreed with Affirmative action I'm a racist.
When I'm unhappy with people that break the laws I'm racist.
When I disagree with Mike on any matter, I then called an obsessed racist.

Need I say More.  The list goes on

Let me introduce you to one of the biggest Cowards on the Internet I know.
So that his wish to remain anonymous will not be infringed upon, I won't print his real name nor nationality.  Because though it's important to him, it's not to me

Here's Mike   aka       . . . . . . . . . .

Looking for his Prius

Some recent excerpts from "On The Left in Victoria"

Perry Mason said...

On topic #1

If we want to stop the onslaught, we need to do the following:
1.) Secure the entire border. Build an impenetrable fence, wall, moat, or whatever from San Diego to the Gulf of Mexico.
2.) Station ARMED National Guard forces along most of the border.
4.) Track who comes in, when they leave, and DEPORT all visa over-stayers.
5.) Address / redress / clarify / repeal Section 1 of the 14th Amendment (birthright issue), and assign the citizenship of a baby born to 2 illegal aliens citizenship of the mother's country-of-origin.
6.) Double / Triple the size of INS / US Border Patrol
7.) Conduct more workplace raids by ICE.
8. ) Stop the massive entitlements (EBT cards, WIC, SNAP / food-stamps, Section 8 housing, etc.)
9.) Require all students to show proof of citizenship when registering for school.
10.) STOP creating incentives and any amnesty / DREAM Act legislation.
11.) Enforce ALL the immigration laws on the books.

Once we do this, illegal aliens will have no choice but to SELF-DEPORT at no-cost to the American taxpayers. Enough is enough. If any sort of amnesty or DREAM Act is approved, we'll see hordes of impoverished, unskilled, uneducated, illiterate, diseased, and criminal Mexicans and Central Americans running for our border at break-neck speed in a tsunami of mass migration the likes we've never seen before. Then, we'll see chain-migration of epic proportions as those here will send for their entire extended families. Is THIS what we want, to turn into the same 3rd world cesspool these people abandoned to come here? I think NOT!
February 6, 2013 at 11:12 AM

BloggerPerry Mason said...
Who's this Von Prien he must've read my mind.

And Born to be me, maybe they were closed. I've been to the store if it's the one by the freeway, and you can pay inside.

You really showed them.
February 6, 2013 at 11:29 AM

BloggerMike said...
I'll ignore the racist statements and just try to answer the ones the ones that might actually be discussed in Washington.

I can't get rid the hateful rhetoric that continues to lose national elections for Republicans, but I'll let these comments stand, so people can see what keeps us from having a civil discussion.

Your 11 proposals of “enforcement only” goes to show how some live in a fact less based world. The border is manageable right now because of our economy, so our economy is not an enticement but you still want to triple the $18 billion we spent last year for securing our borders.

Making e-Verify mandatory will make sense when we require tampering proof documents and a National ID card.

We need to add to the cost of updating the SSA database, Homeland Security Security and build more detention centers, so you are probably asking Congress for another $75 billion since you want to triple everything even thou when we have a zero net gain in southern border crossings right now.

Ratifying the constitution to add an amendment to exclude American citizens will probably take another 10 years. That’s if it passes the Senate and has enough votes to override a presidential veto. Read the 14th Amendment and pay strict attention to the word ALL in BOLD LETTERS and read some court cases where this issue has already been decided.

Non-Citizens cannot receive food stamps, etc....Your gripe is with the states, and churches you would call sanctuaries. The Dream Act will become a reality because even conservative Republicans are in favor of this; they see the handwriting on the wall.

You don't have much faith in our country but I have no doubt you will continue to believe what you want to but watch and see the rest of America come up with a comprehensive immigration plan by early summer. If your party listened to you they will be an endangered species in two years.

Von Prien
I don't want to continue this type of discussion with someone who obviously doesn't know anything about the situation. You knew that but you wanted to make your vile statements...You got your wish.
February 6, 2013 at 12:26 PM

BloggerMike said...
It's easy to read your own mind or whatever is left of it...Veteran bloggers on this site can see through the smoke screens.
February 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM

BloggerPerry Mason said...
Racist, how about a concerned American that wants the borders closed. I'm all for going through the proper channels for citizen ship. But I'm against Amnesty.

So your telling me non-citizens don't receive food stamps, medical care, housing. Then why do they get fake documents and social security cards. Is it to pay someone else's taxes? Or is it to receive free benefits. We know this is a problem, that's a big reason for national ID's. Why on earth is there a tremedous black market for SS cards. It's for the benefits.

And the detention centers for implementing the deportations of illegals are going to be more costly than the influx of cartel criminals, drug runners, and trafickers. Is it true 50% of California prisons are full of illegals. That sure seems to be a problem. A detention center sends them back, A prison shelters, feeds, and cares for them for decades. Got to think in the long run, what costs more money.

I think the anchor babies should go to their mother's country of origin. It's quite odd that illegals can procreate thus creating Americans. Kind of Hypocritical. Anchor baby's are the money factor in illegal households. Once Illegals start dropping babies from the womb, they're automatically eligible for the Welfare Tit.

A net Zero increase in border crossings. They might catch more illegals but they have no real hard facts about how many make it through. Several years ago, and you can fact check it. The Mexican government actually printed pamphlets on how to cross the border and how to get free Government assistance.

So what happens, once a baby is born in an American hospital, and paid for by American Tax-payers, hook line an sinker. the illegal parents fill out the forms for the baby, and begin living off that income also.

Basically, the majority of households across the country benefiting from publicly-funded welfare programs are headed by immigrants, both legal and illegal. States where immigrant households with children have the highest welfare use rates are Arizona (62%), Texas, California and New York with 61% each and Pennsylvania(59%).The study focused on eight major welfare programs that cost the government $517 billion the year they were examined. They include Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for the disabled, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), a nutritional program known as Women, Infants and Children (WIC), food stamps, free/reduced school lunch, public housing and health insurance for the poor (Medicaid).Food assistance and Medicaid are the programs most commonly used by illegal immigrants, mainly on behalf of their American-born children who get automatic citizenship.

Churches aren't giving Federally funded Welware, And no matter how you break down Federally funded Welfare of who doles it out, it's still taken from . . . Tax Dollars

"Read the 14th Amendment and pay strict attention to the word ALL in BOLD LETTERS and read some court cases where this issue has already been decided."

So with this statement, this is your stance that from here on out, nothing in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights is to be changed from this day forward.

I'm good with that. Because chances are changes are politically motivated and not in the best interest of AMERICAN people.

February 6, 2013 at 2:23 PM

BloggerPerry Mason said...
To tell me illegal aliens cannot receive welfare is like playing chess with pigeons - No matter how good you are at chess, the pigeons are just going to knock over the pieces, poop on the board, and strut around.

But he's still getting that welfore check whether he is supposed to or not.

You were really joking about illegals not collecting welfare?

Weren't you?

I'd rather spend 36 billion for the Great Wall, than give away a half a trillion to illegals.

And no matter what the actual figures are in real money, it's going to far exceed the costs of illegals aliens on the welfare tit into the next century. 36 billion instead of umpteen trillions.
February 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM

BloggerPerry Mason said...
"You don't have much faith in our country but I have no doubt you will continue to believe what you want to but watch and see the rest of America come up with a comprehensive immigration plan by early summer. If your party listened to you they will be an endangered species in two years."

Let's break that down, shall we.

Mike if it were up to America, and if we took a vote right now across ALL 57 states(lol). I'd bet the farm that American's would get rid of the illegals.

And that's a damn shame that if my so-called party as you say did become extinct, because of people that break the laws are given amnesty are allowed to usurp American laws, then so be it.
Because you'd have lost checks and balances system of a two party system. Then it would be, what's the word, Socialist, Marxists, Imperialists, not sure but it's one of them.

And Mike why would the party go extinct, would it be that there are 11 million new Democratic Voters? Would they go extinct for enforcing the laws on the books by Criminals and illegals gerrymandering. Because that's exactly what it is.

You can't honsestly believe American citizens would decimate the Republican party, or are you primarily refering to the Democratic party of just one and the 12 million Illegal immigrants causing riots. Spewing hate at public events around America, as you know they do. I thought they were illegal. And the laws are Federally mandated claiming they are illegal. Doesn't it seem that laws should be enforced with out prejudice to any party?
Sure doesn't seem that's by the people for the people! Seems more like pandering. And back scratching.

African Americans that I have talked too are very much against it, so are Caucasions and Asians, and legal Hispanics are adamantly againt this immigration reform.

Lots of competition for the Welfare already.
February 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM

BloggerMike said...
Never said CAN'T but the odds are very slim a constitutional amendment especially the 14th because there are not that many racist like you who want to change the 14th amendment and the 2/3 majority by Congress and the states and the president's signature is not there...Then it wouldn't pass constitutional mustard because of prior cases where it failed.

It's up to 535 members of Congress to decide what to spend and that's not on the list of priorities.

On September of 2008 Wall Street took $8 trillion of capital out of this country and the racists aren't concerned about that...I,m through ,enjoy your latest issue of KKK monthly because I'm through engaging with the uninformed.
February 6, 2013 at 3:04 PM

BloggerMike said...
lol..."African Americans that I have talked too are very much against it, so are Caucasions and Asians, and legal Hispanics are adamantly againt this immigration reform."

Now that's reliable poll for the I have talked to...You have over 300 million to go but national polls disagree with ;in fact most of America does.

Like I said enjoy posting all the vile things you can make up and someone of your ilk might like it but you'll get tired of posting just to see words appear on your screen.
February 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM

BloggerMike said...
WASHINGTON (AP) — More than 6 in 10 Americans now favor allowing illegal immigrants to eventually become U.S. citizens, a major increase in support driven by a turnaround in Republicans' opinions after the 2012 elections.
The finding, in a new Associated Press-GfK poll, comes as the Republican Party seeks to increase its meager support among Latino voters, who turned out in large numbers to help-re- Obama in November.

ele President Barack Obama in November.

Most Americans think illegal immigrants should be able to stay in the United States and apply for citizenship, according to a new CBS News poll.

The 51 percent who favor a path to citizenship represents a 9 percentage point increase from February 2012. Also at that point, 30 percent wanted illegals to leave while 22 percent favored allowing them to stay as guest workers.

Read Latest Breaking News from

WANT MORE…..You have uniformed theories
February 6, 2013 at 3:18 PM

BloggerMike said...
The new poll is in line with an ABC News/Washington Post survey conducted right after the November election that indicated Americans supported a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants by a 57%-39% margin.

And a CNN/ORC International poll conducted in late September indicated 56% of registered voters said the main focus of U.S. policy on illegal immigration should be a plan to allow them to become legal residents, with less than four in ten saying the main emphasis should be deporting illegal immigrants and stopping more from coming to the U.S. That was a switch from last year, when only a minority said the main focus should be to allow illegal immigrants to become legal residents.
February 6, 2013 at 3:22 PM

BloggerPerry Mason said...
So Republicans are racists now, because they're not succumbing to the illegal's interests. I'm trying to have a civil conversation without calling names so you don't have to resort to calling me and other's names, I'm begining to think you hate Caucasions, but I'll let you continue to poop on the chess board instead of calling you a racist.

Back to our civil discussion, you believe in upholding the laws of the land, don't you?

Or do you pick and choose?

I'm still curious to the question I asked in direct relation to your statement: Are Illegals getting welfare?

Now . . . no pooping. Just wanting a civil discussion.

I could pull up polls that contradict you, but I don't care, I'm not here to debate polls, So leave the polls alone please.

?Again how big a drain on the American Taxpayers do you think Illegal aliens cause? the answer would be 0 to infinity. I'm not looking for a fact check number to call you right or wrong. I'm looking for an educated guess by you.

Don't go to ABC(All Barack Channel)
or MSNBC(Most Suitable Network Became Communist)or CNN (Communist Network News. formerly known as Clinton Network News) or FOX( Forgotten Old Xtremists).

Do you think the laws on the books should be enforced?

Because I don't want someone from another country, coming here or staying here illegally, and taking advantage of American Tax dollars, that is no reason to call me a racists.

In closing, cut and paste what makes me a racist?

I've given you my opinions buddy boy, without talking down to you or calling names. You pride yourself being a debater,I've asked you some questions. I want you opinion, not statistical folly whether good, bad, or ugly.

Simple questions, Simple answers.

Now I'm going to wipe all the pigeon poop off the board and let's start again like gentlemen.

Washington AP news 6 out of 10.

Your opinion, not the latest balderdash poll
February 6, 2013 at 4:05 PM

BloggerPerry Mason said...
Another question if you could enlighten me because I do not understand.

"And a CNN/ORC (( INTERNATIONAL POLL )) conducted in late September indicated 56% of registered voters said the main focus of U.S. policy on illegal immigration should be a plan to allow them to become legal residents, with less than four in ten saying the main emphasis should be deporting illegal immigrants and stopping more from coming to the U.S."

I looked up International to help me understand.

in·ter·na·tion·al (ntr-nsh-nl, -nshnl) KEY

Abbr. int. or intl.
Of, relating to, or involving two or more nations: an international commission; international affairs.
Extending across or transcending national boundaries: international fame.

Any of several socialist organizations of international scope formed during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Does that mean CNN is now a Socialists network, or is that a poll conducted in other countries too besides the United States?

Seems odd they would be polling other countries about US immigration then touting the results without naming the other countries.

Or perhaps it is what is is.

Socialist Network.

It's your source.

Do Tell?
February 6, 2013 at 4:22 PM

BloggerMike said...
In my post I never said republicans are racists;my statement was directed at you only because of what you wrote and have in the past. My republicans friends would never say such things.You sir don't represent the GOP nor do they want you to.

You don't know how to have a civil discussion because all your thoughts are based on hate and divisiveness which is the reason you posted for others to see your work.

I've read and heard all the right wing talking points , so your labeling me a socialist (I know the definition) don't phase me a bit because I know who I am...I don't go your blog to insult you or post vile things.

I don't pride myself as a debater;that's just your opinion but I don't argue with the uniformed,racists or trolls.

Im busy..i'm old enough to know better and I bet you can find better things to do than try to entertain your fans.
February 6, 2013 at 5:05 PM

BloggerPerry Mason said...
Golly Mike here I'm again wiping the poop off the chessboard. Besides calling me a racist for the umpteenth time when all I asked you should the laws be enforced for illegal aliens in the country and how much a burden they are on a the US taxpayers.

Then you call another group of people racists(plural) and I politely ask who you're refering too, I would surmise it's a political party but you wont say, and I'm not putting words in your mouth, but only listening to you spew hate, and vile divisiveness towards me and others. And you poop more on the chessboard.
(A quote from your post below) and what racists (plural) are you talking about, a race, or a political party.  Or just general hatred for those that don't agree.
"On September of 2008 Wall Street took $8 trillion of capital out of this country and the racists aren't concerned about that...I,m through ,enjoy your latest issue of KKK monthly because I'm through engaging with the uninformed."

Now you say for me to enjoy the lateast issue of KKK magazine c'mon Mike, all I asked was for you to tell me what ( international ) meant in the CNN poll, that supposedly polled American registered voters, and I wanted to know why it said international. and after all it was the source you chose. And then you say I'm calling you a socialist.

So why are you spewing such hatred to people that are against immigration and breaking American laws. I'm not calling you racist, but I'm beginning to wonder if you have issues with Caucasions, and African Americans because it seems you're quite rude to both races yet you champion hispanics.

There's a pattern here and all I asked was simple questions about welfare, and federal laws.

Many of my friends are hispanic, and to call me a racist is very disturbing coming from someone who thinks federal laws are made to be broken, and that illegal aliens are not using entitlements is disconcerting. You tout American values, but your calling me and others racist for disagreeing with your views, and extremely simple questions. I wasn't aware KKK had a magazine, but obviously we're in different circles.


Thursday, October 11, 2012

Driving with Democrats, Hitching a Ride to the Voter Booth where fraud never existed

Miguel, Que pasa, Tienes Tequila?

Muy Bien.

Ride On --

The moral to the story -- Don't get in a Prius

Hey Buddy boy, where to now?

Monday, January 23, 2012

Compare the Advocate and Enquirer Yourself.

What a rare treat last Sunday, the Advocate front paged a really interesting article for it's readers.  Brought to my mind when people are asked, are you playing with the cat -- or is the cat playing with you.

They published an article about teenagers fighting in public, and the old saying give them enough rope and they'll hang themselves never could have been better.

Jimenez vs the Advocate, a slam dunk double homicide.  What a front page story worthy of the checkout line news rack at any supermarket across the county. Just the other day while checking out one of the leading papers which contained this sensational headline, O.J. Simpson is Kim Kardashian's dad. I wondered to myself if O.J and company had been a blog at the Advocate how it would stack up against the Advocate's front page news last Sunday.

The Enquirer's site had some good stories to compare with, but they don't have a blog site to interact with.

The Advocate's site does that and more, and you can go straight to the story at Advocate, award winner, it really focus's on Victoria and the community. A young 18 year old high school sophomore and his posse beat up on each other in moderate doses at public displays in search of alpha dog characters and codependent cronies for a real in depth look at what's going on in Victoria these days.

Bringing to light these fun loving youth and their extracurricular hobbies, with all the attention they garnered the Advocate really got the blog rolling, especially with all the colorful comments the young film maker could muster with his iPhone feature films and gang-bonic over the top comments guaranteed to put a broad smile on any high school English teacher. 

Couple of helpful commentators suggested that the 18 year old sophomore and aspiring filmmaker solicit H.O.T funds for a good V-town downtown throw down next year. Tattoo artists and street fighters should provide ample entertainment for family members. Throw in a couple of gang fights in the crowds and it's a sure success.

Moving along, the interaction between bloggers had different viewpoints, hence the banter stayed hot and heavy throughout the day.  Seems like those bloggers, that really don't represent Victoria, didn't have anything much to say good about the filmmaker, or his video's.  But the Advocate led the way with thorough journalism and cutting edge storyline to bring us a really in-depth look, even the filmmaker's mother gave the nod of approval, and that's hard to argue  Nice to have family support !

And they followed the story up, as they're known to do like they have in the past, with more blogs and updated new stories.  It's hard to get extremely good stories like this . . . but the Advocate rose to the occasion and let people know where they stand on social issues. They're always every wary to scoop the greatest stories on the streets.  Real young reporters really watch for great news, and when you're close to the action, great stories evolve. 

I didn't want to steal any Advocate thunder so I didn't post the videos, but you can link on them again if you missed anything the first time.

Then the Advocate followed up the story, as to leave no stone unturned with this blog that I'll link you too. 
More youth fight-sport coverage promotional link.

Over all the coverage was thorough and well thought out. Exciting to say the least.

I have to give the nod to the Advocate, as opposed to the Enquirer, on this one.

Plus it garnered some attention to a young and aspiring filmmaker, and as important as the arts have been promoted lately, it really showed what Victoria is all about.

“Beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes clean to the bone.”
Dorothy Parker

 “I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.”
Dorothy Parker

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Editors and Codependency

Everybody seeks approval, it's natural. Others need it more often than not. Some really need to hear it.

What the Advocate doesn't want to hear are opinions that differ, case in point, Mr. Matt Ocker, wrote an editorial to the Advocate last week, in reply, they refused to print it.  But soon a story is going to break.  They ask for an opinion, then they delete it, deny it, or censor it

On one hand the Advocate is holding out an olive branch, whispering in your ear, ever so caring and nice. In their other hand they're holding the delete dagger, and man do they wield it. Editorial citizen slashing is another side of this double edge blade.

Case in point, here's another deleted post, I'm sitting on 12 more, and censoring truth contradicts their mission statement.

Cobler commented they treaded lightly on a sad incident concerning the death of a local citizen, and he still is writing one-sided balderdash, over and over asking what should be done in the pursuit of justifying poor journalism.  

All these points are very valid, Treading lightly you say -- I don't feel the Advocate did that in the recent incident when they reported the manner in which the deceased died. And honestly I'm a little reluctant to even comment on this because in fairness to the family, had the Advocate just reported in a very simple fashion, this blog would not even be here.

It pains me a great deal to think the deceased's children and family members might be reading these comments, and that the man should be honored for his accomplishments, rather than being the reason the Advocate had to take a stance and review how reporting is done on such delicate issues.

I feel anyone with a Master's degree in journalism would already know the delicacy of dealing with a person's feeling in such matters.

And that a public forum is not necessary to give the powers that be in the Advocate a reason to question longstanding journalistic principles.

It reminds me of the Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS) paradigm and to do what's already been done and not ask questions to answers many of us already know.

If it were my choice, I would recommend the Advocate scotch all comments relating to this incident from their website so the kids or family members don't inadvertently stumble across this now, or in the future.

Not a single iota of difference relates to readers what happens behind closed doors at the Advocate's ethic meeting, because they will do what they will do. And that's proven.

I just pray the ethic's committee does what is right and to respect all members in the community through all facets of life and how it is reported, and how words effect the day to day lives of those in this community as they go about their business without having to read one's laundry.

I hope this comment is shared with all the board members, and people take heart how fortunate we are, and for the Advocate to quit asking us what they should do.

And do what is right.

January 12, 2012 at 8:22 p.m. 

Deleted minutes later.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

BREAKING NEWS -- Advocate Blatantly Misinforms Victoria Citizens-- Cover up Suspected.

Ed says,"This is Horse Shit."
Pretty sensational wouldn't you say

The Advocate had the Huevos to post this:  
And My Friends, They Know It's False

Check out the red highlights in one of the latest Editorial Board comments below.

The gentleman filing for the Film Festival funding is Anthony Pedone,  His Father, Dan is one of the larger political contributors in the city, I believe he gave a pretty penny to Don Pozzi's campaign..

In fact he's very well connected in the good ole boy system, and is involved with the Patillo's, the Mayor, etc
How fascinating?

The Advocate is well aware of this and that blatant lie really makes one wonder if the "Running with a Record" article was a political hit piece to influence the county Judge election -- which it did.
Speaking of fascinating this just got posted on Gheni Platenburg's wall, let's see how honorable the Advocate is.     (Place your bets as to the length it will remain)

This would be a great story for a change ! .
Report a Violation
"Gheni, though sometimes we don't see eye to eye, I'm 100% percent behind you on this, and this needs to be addressed, rules are rules.

Hey Advocate, you might want to retract this statement -- It's kind of like when you have a correction to make or a retraction that's necessary.

Copy and pasted from the EditorialBoard 15 January 3:21pm "As for the issue of cronyism, Mr. Pedone's bio indicates he was born in Dallas but spent most of his youth on a ranch in Clayton, N.M. He hardly seems to qualify for inclusion in the so-called "good ol' boys club" of Victoria." 

Wrong Advocate, entirely wrong.... His father was a major Political contributor to the Pozzi election, is friends with the mayor, should I go on, and on here.

Good ole boy, in fact that would be a good story, since the African American Chamber of Commerce was denied funding for deadline tardiness, and the African American business's are here all year long and need the support of the community as opposed to a film festival for three days.

I think excluding them money and giving it to a good ole boy's son, is horrible, and the Advocate's position is questionable. That would be a good story to report on. Is there a good reason behind the scenes here, because the members of your board know this?

As for the issue of cronyism, Mr. Pedone's bio indicates he was born in Dallas but spent most of his youth on a ranch in Clayton, N.M. He hardly seems to qualify for inclusion in the so-called "good ol' boys club" of Victoria. LOL on the Editorial board on this one! "
1/17/2012 - 10:52 AM

EditorialBoard Report a ViolationReport a Violation

We think it's healthy to have a conversation with readers about important local issues of the day. That's why we choose from time to time to respond to readers' questions about our viewpoints.
As long as we have attention focused on this issue, we want to let you know that we will begin webcasting our editorial board meetings. You may join our conversations at 1:30 p.m. Wednesdays. This will be the same format we've used for our morning news meetings. The views expressed here represent a consensus of the board; its members are listed under the Editorial Board bio and on our Viewpoints page.
In terms of the question about Mr. Halepaska's position. He's an honorable man with a legitimate view, expressed by some of you here. We happen to differ with him on this point.
As for the issue of cronyism, Mr. Pedone's bio indicates he was born in Dallas but spent most of his youth on a ranch in Clayton, N.M. He hardly seems to qualify for inclusion in the so-called "good ol' boys club" of Victoria.
Removed Blog
January 15, 2012 at 3:21 p.m.
Then they had the foresight to remove this:

Lyndon B. Johnson, grew up in the middle of nowhere next to a ranch in Johnson city, eating hardtack biscuits living on hardscrabble land, and as things progressed he became the biggest good ole boy of all time, and he did it all without an iPhone.4S

Gotta gets some better fiction than that to use as a talking point--lol.

Instead of hiring experts on the editorial board(hired guns) Edith Ann and Mzmizer woul be an excellent addition to your editorial board. I know the Advocate is greatly concerned with public opinion, and such a move would certainly enhance their stance.

But more likely the vote would run about the same percentages as city council's.

Suddenly it's really refreshing to relax the St.Louis rules of fiefdom and tout new found flexibility.

Rules are for nothing if they're bent.

But that's about flexibility, not consistency.

The only consistency is the trump card dealt time again from the bottom of the dealers deck'.
Always aces and eights when it doesn't suit the agenda and a royal flush when it does.

Gonna get me a deck of cards --

Next year file'em on time -- remember . . .rules
Removed comment:
I had sincerely believed the purpose of the media was to be the eyes and ears of the community at large instead of the voice of the few and select.
I have felt for sometimes that the voices of the citizen's prove most important.
Damn the torpedoes and the full speed ahead mentality backing city council and then blatantly telling your customers, who buy your paper, and advertise with you, that it okay to bend the rules, and you're going to get this whether you like it or not, and as you read these posts, there are jurists and experts pouring over the rules to substantiate the funding.
Kind of reminds me of when Clayton Williams was running for Governor of Texas and his historical comment that you just might as well lay back and enjoy it..
How'd that work out for ole Clayton.
Sounds similar to what's being said now?
January 17, 2012 at 7:55 a.m.