 |
| Hi Mikey, Get Well Soon |
Love Me I'm a Liberal
Haven't blogged alot lately, been enjoying life and good company. But I ventured into Edith Ann's blog last week or should I say uninformed rant on gun control. Calling clips magazines and so on and so forth. Asked her why she is adamantly against large capacity magazines, as I showed videos of people loading them in one second flat into various firearms. I asked her if she knew the difference between large caliber bullets and small caliber bullets and tried to explain how large bullets are so much more deadly than small ones.
I listened to her state how deadly 100 round "Clips" are as opposed to 10 round clips or 20.
I nicely explained that very few 100 round magazines are even in circulation today, and the last instance of a high capacity magazine killing might have been used by Al Capone's henchmen in the 1920's. And most important, they don't work consistently, jam autoloaders, and are extremely bulky.
I asked her if it's ok to kill 10 people with a 10 round clip, and too reload and kill 10 more. Obviously she's in favor of ten round clips, but the 20, 30, 50, and 100 round clips are the killers.
I nicely tried to explain her month long exploration of her Guns & Ammo foray into solving mass murders might not be her cup of tea. But I wholeheartedly agree with her views of people with health problems or illnesses, should be deprived of their right to own firearms.
When these simple facts and videos were linked and explained to her, which in turn pretty much contradicted everything she said, with such little nuances, such as FACTS.
Guess what, the Pigeons came home to roost. Just as she lamented at the Advocate in the past how unsavory, and high-handed the delete Nazi's at the Advocate were. (Many times.) She saw the the unfortunate insertion of a few facts into her blog. You'll never guess what happened . . . .
So the Naziette, took a deep breath, blew a kiss to Schumer and, then she tore a page out of the Advocate's playbook and deleted every post in her blog I had written. Facts are so cumbersome when they don't work for you. I put opinions in there as well, but the facts, well they're correct.
So let's roll on a little about playing chess with pigeons, and remember no matter how good a chess player I am, the pigeons are gonna knock all the pieces to the floor, poop all over the board, then fly away to their nests and poop more. Which suits me, because facts prove so cumbersome.
The same can be said of opinions, but as long as you state your opinions, and preface your statements knowlingly, it is your opinion, at least have the coutesy to write, type, or talk without calling a person . . . . Drum roll . . . . A RACIST.
Here's a well known that fact liberal pigeons have a fond and frequent propensity to call people (Racists) when:
1. Someone disagrees with them.
2. Someone asks them a question they know the answer to be opposite of what they just said or wrote.
3. Someone uses facts against them.
4. Someone has a different opinion that they do.
5. Someone's poll figures are different from theirs
6. Someone questions a word used by their favorite news, media, or polling outlet.
7. Someone asks if welfare theft exists, or if entitlement programs are used by people undeserving.
8. Someone ask to debate them, they say they don't debate, but you read their bio at the Advocate and they love a good debate. Then again refer to numbers 2 and 3.
9. Someone uses statistics other than theirs or their approved agencies.
Where's David Letterman when you need him for number 10. Drum roll.
10. As you're wiping all the poop off the chessboard they have no idea how it got there. But golly, you're a RACIST.
So after that I put my Queen on her own color and then I went to visit local liberal # two. I took a lot of Clorox and rags cause that man sure can poop up a storm, and gentleman, start your engines, Pigeon Mike. true to his form, tagged me for my racist statements in the first sentence and continued to do so right out of the starting blocks and through out his blog.
Have some fun here and notice how bird brain epitomizes the ten liberal jackwagon tell-tale signs of a liberal opining his lack of people skills with repetitive name calling.
A must read. I'll be Perry Mason, in actuality my name is Todd Jett, the liberals prefer to remain anonymous and in the past they've taken great joy telling the world who I am. Especially when they don't agree with me.
Thinks it hurts my feelings, in reality, it's like giving them the trophy of cowardice, which they well deserve for slinging mud behind IP addresses.
Though I don't always agree with Big J. At least he's not a coward, he speaks his mind and signs his name. And much can be said for that. I recently reviewed his past posts at the Advocate, and he's no fan of amnesty.
In my humble opinion, here's probably the biggest coward I have ever blogged too.
Mike has with great joy, written my real name in his blog when he's upset with me for a differing opinion, though I know his real name, I've not done the same to him. I've watched him write for years in the Advocate, and when the Advocate stated transperancy was necessary along with a Facebook account to remain blogging at the Advocate, his cowardice left him to his own blog for fear of you or I knowing who he really is. I assure you . . . it's not National security related.
And anybody he suspected of blogging without permission, well -- he was the mover and shaker behind the scenes at the Advocate.
Rat, Tattletail, Stooge, Stoolie, I'm not name calling. Those are the facts. Some people were banned for off the chart beliefs and serious mud-slinging. I just had a big disagreement with the the Editor as to how a citizen was scalped in the paper. Nothing more, nothing less.
When I called an Advocate reporter out for slanted articles Mike called me a racist.
When I was displeased with Obama I'm a racist.
When I disagreed with Affirmative action I'm a racist.
When I'm unhappy with people that break the laws I'm racist.
When I disagree with Mike on any matter, I then called an obsessed racist.
Need I say More. The list goes on
Let me introduce you to one of the biggest Cowards on the Internet I know.
So that his wish to remain anonymous will not be infringed upon, I won't print his real name nor nationality. Because though it's important to him, it's not to me
Here's Mike aka . . . . . . . . . .
 |
| Looking for his Prius |
Some recent excerpts from "On The Left in Victoria"
Perry Mason said...
If we want to stop the onslaught, we need to do the following:
1.) Secure the entire border. Build an impenetrable fence, wall, moat, or whatever from San Diego to the Gulf of Mexico.
2.) Station ARMED National Guard forces along most of the border.
3.) Make E-VERIFY MANDATORY
4.) Track who comes in, when they leave, and DEPORT all visa over-stayers.
5.) Address / redress / clarify / repeal Section 1 of the 14th Amendment (birthright issue), and assign the citizenship of a baby born to 2 illegal aliens citizenship of the mother's country-of-origin.
6.) Double / Triple the size of INS / US Border Patrol
7.) Conduct more workplace raids by ICE.
8. ) Stop the massive entitlements (EBT cards, WIC, SNAP / food-stamps, Section 8 housing, etc.)
9.) Require all students to show proof of citizenship when registering for school.
10.) STOP creating incentives and any amnesty / DREAM Act legislation.
11.) Enforce ALL the immigration laws on the books.
Once we do this, illegal aliens will have no choice but to SELF-DEPORT at no-cost to the American taxpayers. Enough is enough. If any sort of amnesty or DREAM Act is approved, we'll see hordes of impoverished, unskilled, uneducated, illiterate, diseased, and criminal Mexicans and Central Americans running for our border at break-neck speed in a tsunami of mass migration the likes we've never seen before. Then, we'll see chain-migration of epic proportions as those here will send for their entire extended families. Is THIS what we want, to turn into the same 3rd world cesspool these people abandoned to come here? I think NOT!
Perry Mason said...And Born to be me, maybe they were closed. I've been to the store if it's the one by the freeway, and you can pay inside.
You really showed them.
Mike said...I can't get rid the hateful rhetoric that continues to lose national elections for Republicans, but I'll let these comments stand, so people can see what keeps us from having a civil discussion.
Your 11 proposals of “enforcement only” goes to show how some live in a fact less based world. The border is manageable right now because of our economy, so our economy is not an enticement but you still want to triple the $18 billion we spent last year for securing our borders.
Making e-Verify mandatory will make sense when we require tampering proof documents and a National ID card.
We need to add to the cost of updating the SSA database, Homeland Security Security and build more detention centers, so you are probably asking Congress for another $75 billion since you want to triple everything even thou when we have a zero net gain in southern border crossings right now.
Ratifying the constitution to add an amendment to exclude American citizens will probably take another 10 years. That’s if it passes the Senate and has enough votes to override a presidential veto. Read the 14th Amendment and pay strict attention to the word ALL in BOLD LETTERS and read some court cases where this issue has already been decided.
Non-Citizens cannot receive food stamps, etc....Your gripe is with the states, and churches you would call sanctuaries. The Dream Act will become a reality because even conservative Republicans are in favor of this; they see the handwriting on the wall.
You don't have much faith in our country but I have no doubt you will continue to believe what you want to but watch and see the rest of America come up with a comprehensive immigration plan by early summer. If your party listened to you they will be an endangered species in two years.
Von Prien
I don't want to continue this type of discussion with someone who obviously doesn't know anything about the situation. You knew that but you wanted to make your vile statements...You got your wish.
Mike said...
Perry Mason said...So your telling me non-citizens don't receive food stamps, medical care, housing. Then why do they get fake documents and social security cards. Is it to pay someone else's taxes? Or is it to receive free benefits. We know this is a problem, that's a big reason for national ID's. Why on earth is there a tremedous black market for SS cards. It's for the benefits.
And the detention centers for implementing the deportations of illegals are going to be more costly than the influx of cartel criminals, drug runners, and trafickers. Is it true 50% of California prisons are full of illegals. That sure seems to be a problem. A detention center sends them back, A prison shelters, feeds, and cares for them for decades. Got to think in the long run, what costs more money.
I think the anchor babies should go to their mother's country of origin. It's quite odd that illegals can procreate thus creating Americans. Kind of Hypocritical. Anchor baby's are the money factor in illegal households. Once Illegals start dropping babies from the womb, they're automatically eligible for the Welfare Tit.
A net Zero increase in border crossings. They might catch more illegals but they have no real hard facts about how many make it through. Several years ago, and you can fact check it. The Mexican government actually printed pamphlets on how to cross the border and how to get free Government assistance.
So what happens, once a baby is born in an American hospital, and paid for by American Tax-payers, hook line an sinker. the illegal parents fill out the forms for the baby, and begin living off that income also.
Basically, the majority of households across the country benefiting from publicly-funded welfare programs are headed by immigrants, both legal and illegal. States where immigrant households with children have the highest welfare use rates are Arizona (62%), Texas, California and New York with 61% each and Pennsylvania(59%).The study focused on eight major welfare programs that cost the government $517 billion the year they were examined. They include Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for the disabled, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), a nutritional program known as Women, Infants and Children (WIC), food stamps, free/reduced school lunch, public housing and health insurance for the poor (Medicaid).Food assistance and Medicaid are the programs most commonly used by illegal immigrants, mainly on behalf of their American-born children who get automatic citizenship.
Churches aren't giving Federally funded Welware, And no matter how you break down Federally funded Welfare of who doles it out, it's still taken from . . . Tax Dollars
"Read the 14th Amendment and pay strict attention to the word ALL in BOLD LETTERS and read some court cases where this issue has already been decided."
So with this statement, this is your stance that from here on out, nothing in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights is to be changed from this day forward.
I'm good with that. Because chances are changes are politically motivated and not in the best interest of AMERICAN people.
Perry Mason said...But he's still getting that welfore check whether he is supposed to or not.
You were really joking about illegals not collecting welfare?
Weren't you?
I'd rather spend 36 billion for the Great Wall, than give away a half a trillion to illegals.
And no matter what the actual figures are in real money, it's going to far exceed the costs of illegals aliens on the welfare tit into the next century. 36 billion instead of umpteen trillions.
Perry Mason said...Let's break that down, shall we.
Mike if it were up to America, and if we took a vote right now across ALL 57 states(lol). I'd bet the farm that American's would get rid of the illegals.
And that's a damn shame that if my so-called party as you say did become extinct, because of people that break the laws are given amnesty are allowed to usurp American laws, then so be it.
Because you'd have lost checks and balances system of a two party system. Then it would be, what's the word, Socialist, Marxists, Imperialists, not sure but it's one of them.
And Mike why would the party go extinct, would it be that there are 11 million new Democratic Voters? Would they go extinct for enforcing the laws on the books by Criminals and illegals gerrymandering. Because that's exactly what it is.
You can't honsestly believe American citizens would decimate the Republican party, or are you primarily refering to the Democratic party of just one and the 12 million Illegal immigrants causing riots. Spewing hate at public events around America, as you know they do. I thought they were illegal. And the laws are Federally mandated claiming they are illegal. Doesn't it seem that laws should be enforced with out prejudice to any party?
Sure doesn't seem that's by the people for the people! Seems more like pandering. And back scratching.
African Americans that I have talked too are very much against it, so are Caucasions and Asians, and legal Hispanics are adamantly againt this immigration reform.
Lots of competition for the Welfare already.
Mike said...It's up to 535 members of Congress to decide what to spend and that's not on the list of priorities.
On September of 2008 Wall Street took $8 trillion of capital out of this country and the racists aren't concerned about that...I,m through ,enjoy your latest issue of KKK monthly because I'm through engaging with the uninformed.
Mike said...Now that's reliable poll for the uninformed...lol..People I have talked to...You have over 300 million to go but national polls disagree with ;in fact most of America does.
Like I said enjoy posting all the vile things you can make up and someone of your ilk might like it but you'll get tired of posting just to see words appear on your screen.
Mike said...The finding, in a new Associated Press-GfK poll, comes as the Republican Party seeks to increase its meager support among Latino voters, who turned out in large numbers to help-re- Obama in November.
elehttp://bigstory.ap.org/article/poll-many-say-let-illegal-immigrants-stay-usct President Barack Obama in November.
Most Americans think illegal immigrants should be able to stay in the United States and apply for citizenship, according to a new CBS News poll.
The 51 percent who favor a path to citizenship represents a 9 percentage point increase from February 2012. Also at that point, 30 percent wanted illegals to leave while 22 percent favored allowing them to stay as guest workers.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/illegal-immigrants-citizenship-path/2013/01/29/id/487881#ixzz2K9jfYQ00
!
WANT MORE…..You have uniformed theories
Mike said...And a CNN/ORC International poll conducted in late September indicated 56% of registered voters said the main focus of U.S. policy on illegal immigration should be a plan to allow them to become legal residents, with less than four in ten saying the main emphasis should be deporting illegal immigrants and stopping more from coming to the U.S. That was a switch from last year, when only a minority said the main focus should be to allow illegal immigrants to become legal residents.
Perry Mason said...Back to our civil discussion, you believe in upholding the laws of the land, don't you?
Or do you pick and choose?
I'm still curious to the question I asked in direct relation to your statement: Are Illegals getting welfare?
Now . . . no pooping. Just wanting a civil discussion.
I could pull up polls that contradict you, but I don't care, I'm not here to debate polls, So leave the polls alone please.
?Again how big a drain on the American Taxpayers do you think Illegal aliens cause? the answer would be 0 to infinity. I'm not looking for a fact check number to call you right or wrong. I'm looking for an educated guess by you.
Don't go to ABC(All Barack Channel)
or MSNBC(Most Suitable Network Became Communist)or CNN (Communist Network News. formerly known as Clinton Network News) or FOX( Forgotten Old Xtremists).
Do you think the laws on the books should be enforced?
Because I don't want someone from another country, coming here or staying here illegally, and taking advantage of American Tax dollars, that is no reason to call me a racists.
In closing, cut and paste what makes me a racist?
I've given you my opinions buddy boy, without talking down to you or calling names. You pride yourself being a debater,I've asked you some questions. I want you opinion, not statistical folly whether good, bad, or ugly.
Simple questions, Simple answers.
Now I'm going to wipe all the pigeon poop off the board and let's start again like gentlemen.
Washington AP news 6 out of 10.
Your opinion, not the latest balderdash poll
Perry Mason said..."And a CNN/ORC (( INTERNATIONAL POLL )) conducted in late September indicated 56% of registered voters said the main focus of U.S. policy on illegal immigration should be a plan to allow them to become legal residents, with less than four in ten saying the main emphasis should be deporting illegal immigrants and stopping more from coming to the U.S."
I looked up International to help me understand.
in·ter·na·tion·al (ntr-nsh-nl, -nshnl) KEY
ADJECTIVE:
Abbr. int. or intl.
Of, relating to, or involving two or more nations: an international commission; international affairs.
Extending across or transcending national boundaries: international fame.
NOUN:
International
Any of several socialist organizations of international scope formed during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Does that mean CNN is now a Socialists network, or is that a poll conducted in other countries too besides the United States?
Seems odd they would be polling other countries about US immigration then touting the results without naming the other countries.
Or perhaps it is what is is.
Socialist Network.
It's your source.
Do Tell?
Mike said...You don't know how to have a civil discussion because all your thoughts are based on hate and divisiveness which is the reason you posted for others to see your work.
I've read and heard all the right wing talking points , so your labeling me a socialist (I know the definition) don't phase me a bit because I know who I am...I don't go your blog to insult you or post vile things.
I don't pride myself as a debater;that's just your opinion but I don't argue with the uniformed,racists or trolls.
Im busy..i'm old enough to know better and I bet you can find better things to do than try to entertain your fans.
Perry Mason said...Then you call another group of people racists(plural) and I politely ask who you're refering too, I would surmise it's a political party but you wont say, and I'm not putting words in your mouth, but only listening to you spew hate, and vile divisiveness towards me and others. And you poop more on the chessboard.
(A quote from your post below) and what racists (plural) are you talking about, a race, or a political party. Or just general hatred for those that don't agree.
Now you say for me to enjoy the lateast issue of KKK magazine c'mon Mike, all I asked was for you to tell me what ( international ) meant in the CNN poll, that supposedly polled American registered voters, and I wanted to know why it said international. and after all it was the source you chose. And then you say I'm calling you a socialist.
So why are you spewing such hatred to people that are against immigration and breaking American laws. I'm not calling you racist, but I'm beginning to wonder if you have issues with Caucasions, and African Americans because it seems you're quite rude to both races yet you champion hispanics.
There's a pattern here and all I asked was simple questions about welfare, and federal laws.
Many of my friends are hispanic, and to call me a racist is very disturbing coming from someone who thinks federal laws are made to be broken, and that illegal aliens are not using entitlements is disconcerting. You tout American values, but your calling me and others racist for disagreeing with your views, and extremely simple questions. I wasn't aware KKK had a magazine, but obviously we're in different circles.
GWS.
